![]() There is no serverIPAddress and no connection, so we can probably assume this is not a 'real' network request. The first entry (below) looks like a request that is made by the page and intercepted/handled by the service worker. ![]() SetupĬlear cache, cookies, etc, using the Clear Cache extension. In any case, it would be useful for browsers to record any explicit relationships between HAR entries, so that tools like HAR Viewer could recognise that two entries are for the same logical request, and therefore not display two requests in the waterfall. I also haven't been able to find a combination of existing HAR entry fields that would positively identify an entry as being handled by a service worker (but perhaps there is such a combination). I'm tracking all requests for the URL, which is a critical script for my site.Īs Kayce suggests, within a Chrome HAR file there is no explicit way of determining that an entry was handled by a service worker (as far as I can see). I tried to investigate this a bit in Chrome 70.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |