![]() otf file is going to be much smaller than an equivalent. ![]() OpenType with CFF outline data) or not: a properly designed, real. For this it also matters whether you have a "real". In the real world, the timing differences here are insignificant compared to the time required to download the fonts, so for webfont purposes the only consideration is "which one is smaller", not "which extension does it have". CFF fonts are much more compact because their graphics instructions are incredibly rich (cubic curves, highly controllable rasterizer hints, arbitrary byte subroutines for reusing any shared outline or outline property), but that also means they take more time to decode.TrueType fonts are bigger because their graphics instructions aren't very rich (only quadratic curves are supported, with highly limited rasterizer instructions, and you can't go smaller than "full glyphs" for reuse), but are really easy to parse.ttf is almost universally an OpenType font with TrueType outlines. otf is almost universally an OpenType font with CFF outlines, and a. Slightly longer answer: Both formats are supported by virtually everything, and both formats are simply different kinds of OpenType (the spec) fonts, so can be packed as WOFF (or, these days, WOFF2) so you don't even need to know whether it was an. Short answer: The difference is irrelevant in the context you're asking about.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |